This morning on NPR's Car Talk Tom and Ray were discussing a recently purchased Dodge Caravan. I'm not sure which of them was speaking, so I can't say which one bought the minivan, but apparently one of them (let's just say it was Tom) bought a new Caravan and was, as per the driver's manual instructions, breaking the car in slowly. Unfortunately, despite this careful driving, the car at some point "threw a connecting rod." Now, obviously Tom, being a car aficionado, knew that the sound he heard emanating from the engine area was that of a thrown rod. Tom also knew that if he stopped driving then and there, Dodge would take the car for a month, and eventually return it to him with a refurbished engine (which would obviously be inferior, and not the kind of thing one wants in one's new car). So, rather that stopping, Tom just kept on driving, thereby completely destroying the engine (a result he knew full well would occur). The result: a brand new engine, presumably higher resale value for the car, and in much less time.
I'm not sure what to make of this. It's very clever, certainly. Beyond that, it seems somehow wrong, although unless he violated some contractual provision in the warranty, I can't imagine that there would be any legal recourse of Dodge's part.
Society would have been better off if Tom had just brought the car to Dodge and they had given him a new engine and refurbished and sold the damaged one. Obviously it's a small subset of the population that knows enough about cars to destroy their engines -- but you'd think that Dodge would want to somehow get these damaged engines in for replacement... What would have happened if Tom had said to Dodge, "Listen, I have this thrown rod. I'm going to keep driving until the engine is worthless, unless you promise to give me a new engine (and perhaps pay me a fee)." Dodge would be better off paying epsilon less than the value of the refurbished engine (ignoring service costs and the like), right?
Incidentally, at the conclusion of each Car Talk the brothers go through their list of "cast and crew." The whole list is available here and worth taking a peak. Some of my favorites:
-- Fact checker: Ella Fynoe
-- Race team driver: Andy Zoff
-- Safety officers: Mort & Fay Tality
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(473)
-
▼
January
(116)
- A Home for the Imagination: It grew up around the ...
- Car Talk question
- Snopes on Superbowl
- Mr Cranky strikes again
- Strategic deterrence
- Never Say Die, by Michael Kinsley
- General Malaise: Democrats, for the good of the co...
- The Heart of Politics: One Woman, Two Senators and...
- Claremont Review of Books on Volokh
- BBC Apologises As Dyke Quits
- In Shake-Up, Dean Names Gore Ally to Run Campaign
- Chevron's Station
- To ponder on...
- Scalia and Stevens - An introduction
- Up and coming analysis
- Yeahs and Boos on immigration
- Judge Says R. Kelly Must Avoid Jackson
- Trailer watch.
- Cline on Kucinich
- Good Scalia quote
- Clark Contrasts Humble Roots with Yale-Educated Ri...
- With Fanfare and a Grand Parade, Paris Celebrates ...
- Water birthing
- Kazaa sues music industry...
- Alert: Dancing German Monster Thing
- Death penalty responses
- "Xerox"
- "Apple's diplomatic core"
- Adopting law
- Blockbuster rents porn
- Agatha Christie - One published lady.
- Note the email...
- Political compass
- Kobe Bryant racism charge...
- Thomas Kinkade
- Hey, Nobody Noticed!
- Mars rover sending data again
- Student Sex Case in Georgia Stirs Claims of Old So...
- California Democrats Face Grim Post-Mortem
- 2 Jewish Leaders Upset After Viewing 'Passion'
- Michael Moore
- Blogging from Atlanta
- Bargaining for Freedom, by Nicholas D. Kristof
- Rehnquist Questioned on Cheney-Scalia Trip
- Dean Plans Return To 'Who I Really Am'
- Chinese Move to Relax Severe Judicial Penalties
- Death penalty thoughts
- The Bush Conspiracy Theory Generator
- Nintendo's Big, Bad Gamble
- Commenting Feature Changed
- More lawsuits filed by RIAA
- Brian was right?!
- Pitzer College: A Bunch of Loons
- Microsoft Compliance Report
- Look before you leap
- Kozinski Quotables
- Imperfect credit markets
- Iowa Caucus Roundup
- 1000 Hits and a Few More Links
- Michael Jackson proves his innocence!
- Efficient contract avoidance
- Kucinich's New Strategy
- Illegal downloading on the rise
- Grover
- An...err... interesting writing competition
- U Chicago Law Clinic Victory
- Trailer Watch
- Michael Moore: 'We're going to have the best chanc...
- Cass-piracy Theories
- Airline Gave Government Information on Passengers
- Cheney Hunting Trip With Scalia Raises Impartialit...
- Rumors of Castro's Death Sweep Miami-Dade -- Again
- What A Day!
- President Bush Uses Recess Appointment for Pickering
- Release Saddam Say Jordan Lawyers
- Carol Moseley Braun Reportedly Dropping Out of Rac...
- Chicago Judges Project
- *The* Ad
- Irony defined:
- Defining corporations...
- The Bush Democrats, by David Brooks
- Jeff Jarvis - Claremont Man
- Carol for President!
- Tournament of Federal Appellate Judges
- The Food Network and Good Eats
- A Great Time-waster!
- Law and Econ at work...
- Public Service Messages
- One approach to free cable...
- A (not THE) Ginsburg in Chicago?
- Blogging Excuse
- Telepathic horses
- Law & Order coloring books!
- The New Republic Endorses Lieberman
- Iraq's Arsenal Was Only on Paper
- Woman Says She Lost Ticket Worth $162 Million
- Hillary Clinton 'truly regrets' Gandhi Joke: Remar...
- Arkansas Executes Mentally Ill Inmate
- Bill Bradley to Back Dean
- 500 Hits and Counting
-
▼
January
(116)
No comments:
Post a Comment