Will posts about contracts and asks why contracts that make people better off often never materialize.
An interesting question. University of Chicago Professor Lisa Bernstein asks a similar question about the diamond industry in New York: Why the prevelance of orthodox Jews?* The answer, she writes, is that the orthodox Jewish community faces much lower transaction costs by opting out of the legal system. They operate with a high level of mutual trust, which in turn lowers transaction costs, allowing members of that particular group to operate at costs at which unaffiliated merchants cannot compete. Thus, a partial answer to Will's question may be not contract aversion, or transaction costs but actually a rational preference. The contract may make people better off for that single transaction (the one that goes bad), but overall it decreases utility. Under certain circumstances opting out of private law arrangements that require resort to courts for enforcement is efficient. It's tempting to criticize this thought process ex post, but ex ante, if parties do not know which engagements will go sour, they will choose to operate in order to maximize the expected value of the sum of the interactions.
This is not an isolated phenomenon. Parties typically rely on extralegal enforcement, not out of transaction costs and regardless of the underlying legal rule. Sometimes it's just much more efficient. For example, it may not really matter what the legal rule is that attaches to corporate management's liability for accounting fraud because reputational consequences are far more powerful than any punishment offered by law. (Not really, of course, as Ken Lay can attest. But hopefully the point is somewhat clear.)
This is somewhat more difficult to argue with regard to marriage, especially because marriage is not (usually) a repeated event... Anywho, those are my thoughts on the subject.
*See "Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry," 21 Journal of Legal Studies 115 (1992) (not available on Lexis, nor on Westlaw, but available through HeinOnline, I believe, if you are an on-campus student). Also discussed in Epstein's Simple Rules for a Complex World.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(473)
-
▼
January
(116)
- A Home for the Imagination: It grew up around the ...
- Car Talk question
- Snopes on Superbowl
- Mr Cranky strikes again
- Strategic deterrence
- Never Say Die, by Michael Kinsley
- General Malaise: Democrats, for the good of the co...
- The Heart of Politics: One Woman, Two Senators and...
- Claremont Review of Books on Volokh
- BBC Apologises As Dyke Quits
- In Shake-Up, Dean Names Gore Ally to Run Campaign
- Chevron's Station
- To ponder on...
- Scalia and Stevens - An introduction
- Up and coming analysis
- Yeahs and Boos on immigration
- Judge Says R. Kelly Must Avoid Jackson
- Trailer watch.
- Cline on Kucinich
- Good Scalia quote
- Clark Contrasts Humble Roots with Yale-Educated Ri...
- With Fanfare and a Grand Parade, Paris Celebrates ...
- Water birthing
- Kazaa sues music industry...
- Alert: Dancing German Monster Thing
- Death penalty responses
- "Xerox"
- "Apple's diplomatic core"
- Adopting law
- Blockbuster rents porn
- Agatha Christie - One published lady.
- Note the email...
- Political compass
- Kobe Bryant racism charge...
- Thomas Kinkade
- Hey, Nobody Noticed!
- Mars rover sending data again
- Student Sex Case in Georgia Stirs Claims of Old So...
- California Democrats Face Grim Post-Mortem
- 2 Jewish Leaders Upset After Viewing 'Passion'
- Michael Moore
- Blogging from Atlanta
- Bargaining for Freedom, by Nicholas D. Kristof
- Rehnquist Questioned on Cheney-Scalia Trip
- Dean Plans Return To 'Who I Really Am'
- Chinese Move to Relax Severe Judicial Penalties
- Death penalty thoughts
- The Bush Conspiracy Theory Generator
- Nintendo's Big, Bad Gamble
- Commenting Feature Changed
- More lawsuits filed by RIAA
- Brian was right?!
- Pitzer College: A Bunch of Loons
- Microsoft Compliance Report
- Look before you leap
- Kozinski Quotables
- Imperfect credit markets
- Iowa Caucus Roundup
- 1000 Hits and a Few More Links
- Michael Jackson proves his innocence!
- Efficient contract avoidance
- Kucinich's New Strategy
- Illegal downloading on the rise
- Grover
- An...err... interesting writing competition
- U Chicago Law Clinic Victory
- Trailer Watch
- Michael Moore: 'We're going to have the best chanc...
- Cass-piracy Theories
- Airline Gave Government Information on Passengers
- Cheney Hunting Trip With Scalia Raises Impartialit...
- Rumors of Castro's Death Sweep Miami-Dade -- Again
- What A Day!
- President Bush Uses Recess Appointment for Pickering
- Release Saddam Say Jordan Lawyers
- Carol Moseley Braun Reportedly Dropping Out of Rac...
- Chicago Judges Project
- *The* Ad
- Irony defined:
- Defining corporations...
- The Bush Democrats, by David Brooks
- Jeff Jarvis - Claremont Man
- Carol for President!
- Tournament of Federal Appellate Judges
- The Food Network and Good Eats
- A Great Time-waster!
- Law and Econ at work...
- Public Service Messages
- One approach to free cable...
- A (not THE) Ginsburg in Chicago?
- Blogging Excuse
- Telepathic horses
- Law & Order coloring books!
- The New Republic Endorses Lieberman
- Iraq's Arsenal Was Only on Paper
- Woman Says She Lost Ticket Worth $162 Million
- Hillary Clinton 'truly regrets' Gandhi Joke: Remar...
- Arkansas Executes Mentally Ill Inmate
- Bill Bradley to Back Dean
- 500 Hits and Counting
-
▼
January
(116)
No comments:
Post a Comment