Reading a case recently (LePage's v 3M), I noticed that the dissent used the word "ironical." Now, I always thought this wasn't a real word. But, according to dictionary.com, it is. See here.
Interestingly, the definition listed online contains the following fascinating usage note:
"The words ironic, irony, and ironically are sometimes used of events and circumstances that might better be described as simply “coincidental” or “improbable,” in that they suggest no particular lessons about human vanity or folly. Thus 78 percent of the Usage Panel rejects the use of ironically in the sentence 'In 1969 Susie moved from Ithaca to California where she met her husband-to-be, who, ironically, also came from upstate New York.' Some Panelists noted that this particular usage might be acceptable if Susie had in fact moved to California in order to find a husband, in which case the story could be taken as exemplifying the folly of supposing that we can know what fate has in store for us. By contrast, 73 percent accepted the sentence 'Ironically, even as the government was fulminating against American policy, American jeans and videocassettes were the hottest items in the stalls of the market,' where the incongruity can be seen as an example of human inconsistency."
A quick Lexis search shows that "ironical" appears in 350 state and federal cases, including a bunch from the Supreme Court. I guess that means it really is a word. Or if it's not, I can't fault an appeals court for using it - after all, they're just following precedent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(473)
-
▼
February
(75)
- Book review
- 3000 Hits
- "Massachusetts Supreme Court Orders All Citizens t...
- Jack Ryan for Senator (?)
- Enforcement problems?
- Deference
- Milton Friedman: My Hero
- The Great Airport Outlet Search
- "Please Ralph, Not This Year"
- One view of the Constitution
- Welcome Perverts!
- Chess
- My take on Adbusters
- "Links To This Post" Feature
- GWB barbs back
- Posner's Spawn
- Globalization and rising standards of living
- I have returned.
- Blunt and Influential, Kerry's Wife Is an X Factor
- Places I've Been
- Japanese Law Schools
- Internet Cell Phone Access UPDATE
- U.S. Students Still Getting the Paddle
- Democrats United in Asking That Nader Not Enter Race
- Election Law Robs TV Soap of Biggest Star
- Bill Pryor Recess Appointment
- Private Bush Meeting Gets Blogged
- Internet Cell Phone Access
- In Japan, A Wireless Vision of Future for U.S.
- 13.5.1 Strikes Back!
- Bedtime Reading
- Pomona Controversy Over Photograph Hunt
- Dean To End His Campaign
- Thinking About Class Actions Differently
- Triumph strikes Canada!
- "Whites only scholarship"
- College Football and the Law
- Bestsellers of the 20th Century
- Is limited liability necessary?
- Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviewers
- Greece Struggles to Reach Olympics' Finish Line
- Bay Street?
- Kerry Concerns
- The Guest
- Peanut Butter Squares...
- Fischel tells Kerkorian to "shut up"
- A host with a lisp.
- College-Sponsored Student Sex Magazines
- Wesley Clark Drops Out of the Race
- Announcing A Guest Blogger
- Wonder of wonders!
- A Sign that Clark Will Not Be The Nominee
- Excellent O'Connor editorial
- Another Reader Challenge: Most Extensive Education
- Separated at birth?
- Kerry's Special Friends, by David Brooks
- Homosexual animals...
- Hyperlink Technology
- Interesting Artifact
- Woman Charged with Lying About Gang Rape
- PBS Fans - Prepare your TiVos
- "Ironical"?
- "Mr Class Action"
- Practice LSAT
- The Kennewick Man's Not-So-Speedy Trial
- The best part of antitrust
- Two arrested in robbery spree
- Gays Have Full Marriage Rights, Massachusetts Cour...
- 20 (fake) Questions
- A Super Tuesday . . . for Some
- Great Star Trek: TNG Scene
- As Ben said . . .
- TiVo tracking....
- Blogging the Super Bowl
- U of C Economist Wins Clark Medal
-
▼
February
(75)
No comments:
Post a Comment