Whilst in the midst of my research I came upon this interesting article: The Market for Shares of Companies with Unlimited Liability: The Case of American Express in The Journal of Legal Studies. Apparently at some point American Express was a pro rata unlimited liability company. The authors try to determine what the impact of unlimited liability was on stock prices, and conclude that investors didn't consider investments in AmEx any riskier than other investments. It's not a great article (in the sense that their conclusion doesn't seem particularly persuasive in light of the evidence), but it is interesting. I'm curious why AmEx was an unlimited liability company. Fascinating.
For anyone who's interested, the above article is part of a now-passe debate on whether limited liability is necessary following a series of articles by Henry Hansmann and Reinier H. Kraakman (e.g. Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts, 100 Yale L J 1879, 1916 (1991)), where the authors argue for unlimited liability for shareholders distributed on a pro rata basis. I think that the arguments for limited liability are pretty strong, but Hansmaan and Kraakman make a very interesting proposal. There certainly is a strong case to make that corporate fictions sometimes result in unfair treatment of involuntary creditors (e.g. tort victims). But given the benefits of the corporate fiction, see Easterbrook & Fischel, Limited Liability and the Corporation, 52 U Chi L Rev 89, it would be hard to convince me that the overall benefits from unlimited liability would outweigh the costs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(473)
-
▼
February
(75)
- Book review
- 3000 Hits
- "Massachusetts Supreme Court Orders All Citizens t...
- Jack Ryan for Senator (?)
- Enforcement problems?
- Deference
- Milton Friedman: My Hero
- The Great Airport Outlet Search
- "Please Ralph, Not This Year"
- One view of the Constitution
- Welcome Perverts!
- Chess
- My take on Adbusters
- "Links To This Post" Feature
- GWB barbs back
- Posner's Spawn
- Globalization and rising standards of living
- I have returned.
- Blunt and Influential, Kerry's Wife Is an X Factor
- Places I've Been
- Japanese Law Schools
- Internet Cell Phone Access UPDATE
- U.S. Students Still Getting the Paddle
- Democrats United in Asking That Nader Not Enter Race
- Election Law Robs TV Soap of Biggest Star
- Bill Pryor Recess Appointment
- Private Bush Meeting Gets Blogged
- Internet Cell Phone Access
- In Japan, A Wireless Vision of Future for U.S.
- 13.5.1 Strikes Back!
- Bedtime Reading
- Pomona Controversy Over Photograph Hunt
- Dean To End His Campaign
- Thinking About Class Actions Differently
- Triumph strikes Canada!
- "Whites only scholarship"
- College Football and the Law
- Bestsellers of the 20th Century
- Is limited liability necessary?
- Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviewers
- Greece Struggles to Reach Olympics' Finish Line
- Bay Street?
- Kerry Concerns
- The Guest
- Peanut Butter Squares...
- Fischel tells Kerkorian to "shut up"
- A host with a lisp.
- College-Sponsored Student Sex Magazines
- Wesley Clark Drops Out of the Race
- Announcing A Guest Blogger
- Wonder of wonders!
- A Sign that Clark Will Not Be The Nominee
- Excellent O'Connor editorial
- Another Reader Challenge: Most Extensive Education
- Separated at birth?
- Kerry's Special Friends, by David Brooks
- Homosexual animals...
- Hyperlink Technology
- Interesting Artifact
- Woman Charged with Lying About Gang Rape
- PBS Fans - Prepare your TiVos
- "Ironical"?
- "Mr Class Action"
- Practice LSAT
- The Kennewick Man's Not-So-Speedy Trial
- The best part of antitrust
- Two arrested in robbery spree
- Gays Have Full Marriage Rights, Massachusetts Cour...
- 20 (fake) Questions
- A Super Tuesday . . . for Some
- Great Star Trek: TNG Scene
- As Ben said . . .
- TiVo tracking....
- Blogging the Super Bowl
- U of C Economist Wins Clark Medal
-
▼
February
(75)
No comments:
Post a Comment