Not surprisingly, San Francisco's mayor has an interesting set of theories regarding rights and the Constitution.
Some choice quotes:
"I can't believe people of good conscience, from any ideological perspective, can honestly say that the Constitution should be used to take rights away from people when the Constitution was conceived to advance the rights of people in this country." [I did not know that was the original purpose of the Constitution. Fascinating. Someone should let the "three fifths of all other Persons" people in on that.]
"It's fundamentally wrong on principle, and we've got to have the courage to stand up and say enough, stop." [I'm curious which principle he's referring to...]
My favorite quote is from an ACLU representative: "The Constitution has ... been amended ... usually to expand people's rights. Only one time has it been amended to limit rights -- Prohibition -- and you can see how well that turned out." [What powerful logic. What else is there to say?]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(473)
-
▼
February
(75)
- Book review
- 3000 Hits
- "Massachusetts Supreme Court Orders All Citizens t...
- Jack Ryan for Senator (?)
- Enforcement problems?
- Deference
- Milton Friedman: My Hero
- The Great Airport Outlet Search
- "Please Ralph, Not This Year"
- One view of the Constitution
- Welcome Perverts!
- Chess
- My take on Adbusters
- "Links To This Post" Feature
- GWB barbs back
- Posner's Spawn
- Globalization and rising standards of living
- I have returned.
- Blunt and Influential, Kerry's Wife Is an X Factor
- Places I've Been
- Japanese Law Schools
- Internet Cell Phone Access UPDATE
- U.S. Students Still Getting the Paddle
- Democrats United in Asking That Nader Not Enter Race
- Election Law Robs TV Soap of Biggest Star
- Bill Pryor Recess Appointment
- Private Bush Meeting Gets Blogged
- Internet Cell Phone Access
- In Japan, A Wireless Vision of Future for U.S.
- 13.5.1 Strikes Back!
- Bedtime Reading
- Pomona Controversy Over Photograph Hunt
- Dean To End His Campaign
- Thinking About Class Actions Differently
- Triumph strikes Canada!
- "Whites only scholarship"
- College Football and the Law
- Bestsellers of the 20th Century
- Is limited liability necessary?
- Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviewers
- Greece Struggles to Reach Olympics' Finish Line
- Bay Street?
- Kerry Concerns
- The Guest
- Peanut Butter Squares...
- Fischel tells Kerkorian to "shut up"
- A host with a lisp.
- College-Sponsored Student Sex Magazines
- Wesley Clark Drops Out of the Race
- Announcing A Guest Blogger
- Wonder of wonders!
- A Sign that Clark Will Not Be The Nominee
- Excellent O'Connor editorial
- Another Reader Challenge: Most Extensive Education
- Separated at birth?
- Kerry's Special Friends, by David Brooks
- Homosexual animals...
- Hyperlink Technology
- Interesting Artifact
- Woman Charged with Lying About Gang Rape
- PBS Fans - Prepare your TiVos
- "Ironical"?
- "Mr Class Action"
- Practice LSAT
- The Kennewick Man's Not-So-Speedy Trial
- The best part of antitrust
- Two arrested in robbery spree
- Gays Have Full Marriage Rights, Massachusetts Cour...
- 20 (fake) Questions
- A Super Tuesday . . . for Some
- Great Star Trek: TNG Scene
- As Ben said . . .
- TiVo tracking....
- Blogging the Super Bowl
- U of C Economist Wins Clark Medal
-
▼
February
(75)
No comments:
Post a Comment