Not sure if Brian beat me to this, but this is quite funny:

I especially like the statement of the Fish & Game Commission commissioner deciding to block the sale of genetically modified pet fish: "For me it's a question of values, it's not a question of science."

Aren't Californians lucky they have the Fish & Game commissioner deciding their moral questions for them? I'm acutally curious if it's within the job description of the commissioner to make values-based decisions. It seems that once the product is declared environmentally safe it should be in the hands of some constituent-accountable body to make values decisions.

And where is Arnold in all of this? Is this the kind of less-government-approach Californians can expect from him? Just curious.